1. Home
  2. Contemporary World
  3. Korean War
  4. Inchon

Battle

Inchon

15 — 19 September 1950

Tides and surprise reverse a front that seemed doomed.

Military history

How did a landing in a harbor judged hazardous cut off the army that was still advancing toward Busan?

Inchon was an amphibious gamble: tides, channels, and quays made the landing difficult, but those same constraints reduced the likelihood of a prepared defense on the correct axis. MacArthur gambled on surprise and depth rather than frontal strength at the Pusan Perimeter.

The Pusan Perimeter

The North Korean army has almost driven UN forces into the peninsula’s southeastern corner, but it is stretched around a long front and difficult roads.

An unlikely landing

Inchon has extreme tides, muddy channels, and seawalls. These obstacles make the operation risky, but also lower the defender’s expectations.

Two fronts to coordinate

The landing succeeds only if the army at Pusan attacks at the same time and prevents North Korean divisions from withdrawing toward Seoul.

Military history

Sources

Contemporary sourceUS Marine Corps, The Inchon-Seoul Operation

Rapports du débarquement et des combats de Séoul

Tides, beaches, units, and advance.

War historyClay Blair, The Forgotten War

Chapitres sur Inchon et la rupture du périmètre de Pusan

Context, command, and consequences.

Official historyUS Army Center of Military History, The Korean War

Sections sur Inchon, Séoul et Pusan

Operational sequence and change of strategic phase.

View ↗
Official naval history and mapsUS Naval History and Heritage Command, The Inchon Invasion

Dossier opérationnel sur le débarquement du 15 septembre 1950

Maps of Flying Fish Channel, Wolmi-do, tides, beaches, and the landing sequence.

View ↗

Edited by BattlesInMotion.com