1. Home
  2. Antiquity
  3. Second Punic War
  4. Lake Trasimene

Battle

Lake Trasimene

217 BC

A Roman column enters a concealed corridor; the vanguard’s breakout remains contained

Military history

How does a concealed deployment turn the Roman march into fragmented fighting around Lake Trasimene?

After the Trebia, Hannibal ravages the territory of Rome’s allies to draw the consul Gaius Flaminius out before he can join the other consular army. The ancient accounts then place the Roman army on the northern shore of Lake Trasimene, in a passage bounded by water and high ground. Carthaginian forces deploy at night and wait until much of the column is committed before launching converging attacks. Mist and the corridor’s geometry fragment Roman perception; the main battle becomes a disaster, but a group of about 6,000 men breaks through the front before being pursued and captured the next day. The battlefield’s precise location, the strength of the forces and several casualty figures remain disputed.

Draw out the consul before the junction

Polybius and Livy connect the engagement with Flaminius’s pursuit of Hannibal. The Carthaginian commander ravages Rome’s allies and exploits the separation of the consular armies; the exact intention and degree of moral reconstruction are not identical in the two accounts.

Turn the route into a trap

The lake restricts movement to the south and high ground dominates the passage to the north. Hannibal distributes his contingents before dawn; the mist further reduces visibility. The modern location of this corridor remains a reconstruction, distinct from established cartographic fact.

A victory still requiring exploitation

The attack destroys the cohesion of most of the Roman army, but the vanguard breaks through the front. The nocturnal pursuit and surrender the next day form part of the result, as does Rome’s political response; they must not be merged into the initial clash.

Military history

Sources

Primary sourcePolybe, Histoires, livre III

III.80–86, surtout III.83–85 pour le dispositif, le combat et la sortie des 6 000 ; III.86 pour la suite immédiate

Flaminius drawn out, choice of passage, Carthaginian deployment, converging attack, divergent losses and delayed capture of the vanguard.

View ↗
Primary sourceTite-Live, Histoire romaine, livre XXII

XXII.3–8, surtout XXII.4–6 pour la brume, le combat et Flaminius ; XXII.7–8 pour les pertes, les 6 000, Centenius et Fabius

Version of the march without scouts, duration of about three hours, death of Flaminius, breakout and surrender the next day, and Roman consequences.

View ↗
Specialised scholarly workJohn F. Lazenby, “Trasimene”, Oxford Classical Dictionary

Extrait public de l’entrée : paragraphes sur l’ordre de grandeur des armées, le passage de la rive nord, la disposition des contingents, les pertes et le désaccord topographique

Modern orders of magnitude, synthesis of the ambush and bounds of the debate among proposed locations.

View ↗
Specialised scholarly editionJohn Briscoe et Simon Hornblower (éd.), Livy: Ab urbe condita Book XXII, Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics

Frontmatter, pp. ix–x ; carte 2, p. xv ; notes annoncées à Livy 22.4.1–7.5, avec sites et positions marqués d’un point d’interrogation

Editorial framework for reading Livy, use of Lazenby’s maps and cautious visualisation of the two locations and Carthaginian groups.

View ↗
Specialised scholarly chapterNicolas Wiater, “Visualising Battle in Image and Text: Reading Kromayer against Polybius”

Chapitre 4, pp. 67–83 ; notice et résumé publics du Research Portal de l’université de St Andrews

Methodological caution: Polybius’s account reproduces a cognitive experience of battle and is insufficient to produce a modern map by the metre.

View ↗
Specialist pressANSA, “Reperti bellici e antico cippo stradale emersi dal Trasimeno”

25 août 2022, article sur la baisse du lac : obus attribués au retrait allemand de 1944 et repère examiné comme moderne ou contemporain par la Soprintendenza

Bound the use of recent finds: they do not provide archaeological proof of the location of the battle in 217 BCE.

View ↗

Edited by BattlesInMotion.com