1. Home
  2. World Wars
  3. First World War
  4. Verdun

Battle

Verdun

21 February — 15 December 1916

The blow on the right bank becomes a battle sustained on both banks, followed by a French recovery with limited objectives

Military history

Why did the initial German gains give way to a battle of attrition and then a French recovery on the right bank?

On 21 February 1916, a German concentration of artillery and infantry opened an offensive on the right bank of the Meuse whose initial objective remains disputed. French positions gave way in the Bois des Caures and Fort Douaumont fell on 25 February, but Verdun did not collapse. Pétain then turned the defence into a system: reorganised fire, reliefs and supplies travelled up the Bar-le-Duc road, soon called the Voie Sacrée. In March, the German offensive extended to Mort-Homme and Hill 304, then returned towards Vaux, Fleury and Souville; every gain added a sector to be held without opening the road to the city. After the failure before Souville and the transfer of the initiative, the French offensives of October and December recovered most German gains on the right bank. Part of the left bank, however, remained German until 1917. Verdun was therefore less an immobile line than a succession of blows, logistical flows and local objectives whose scope changes the assessment.

A genuinely disputed German objective

Falkenhayn's later memoir presents Verdun as a point France would have to defend to exhaustion. No contemporary original of this ‘Christmas memorandum’ has been found. A note by Knobelsdorf dated 4 January 1916, however, describes the rapid capture of the fortress and the heights on the right bank. The operation therefore combined an attested territorial aim with a logic of pressure whose exact formulation remains debated.

The first blow falls only on the right bank

The Fifth Army assembled about 150,000 infantry and 1,200 guns opposite a sector where the Mémorial counts nearly 25,000 French infantry, 140 heavy guns and two and a half reserve divisions. At 07:15 on 21 February, the bombardment opened an attack between the Meuse and the Woëvre plain. The disparity prepared a shock, but must be distinguished from the automatic occupation of Verdun.

A defence created through throughput

After Douaumont fell, Pétain took command of the Second Army on 26 February. The Bar-le-Duc–Verdun axis carried units, shells and food forward and the wounded rearward. Rotation spread the ordeal across much of the French Army; it did not reduce losses, but prevented a single exhausted garrison from deciding the fate of the fortress.

Two banks multiply the constraints

From 6 March, the German attack targeted Mort-Homme and then Hill 304 to reduce the French fire enfilading the right bank. The expansion produced gains in the west, but also required support for two sets of fighting separated by the Meuse, while Douaumont, Vaux and Souville remained contested in the east.

Explore

Chronological dossier

Battle · 24 October — 12 November 1917CaporettoThree coordinated penetrations through Plezzo, the Isonzo valley and the ridges shatter the IV and XXVII Corps, then the pursuit drives the Italian army back to the Piave.Battle · 8 — 12 August 1918AmiensThe Allies combine tanks, artillery, aviation and infantry to break German defences before they can be rebuilt.Battle · 19 — 25 September 1918MegiddoAllenby pins the Ottomans in the east, breaks through near the coast and sends cavalry into the rear of the Eighth Army.Battle · 26 — 30 August 1914TannenbergThe Germans strip the north, strike Samsonov's two wings separately, then close the roads through Neidenburg, Passenheim and Willenberg around his centre.Battle · 19 February 1915 — 9 January 1916Gallipoli CampaignMines halt the naval gamble; separate landings remain contained below the ridges, then deception enables the evacuation of Anzac, Suvla and Helles.Battle · 1 July — 18 November 1916Battle of the SommeThe bombardment produces opposite results in different sectors; gains in the south and at Bazentin run into strongpoints and reserves, then four months of adaptation push the front back without opening it.Battle · 4 June — 20 September 1916Brusilov OffensiveFour armies prepare several sectors and open the Austro-Hungarian front together; when reserves belatedly concentrate towards Kovel, the Stokhid, German reinforcements and lengthening supply lines exhaust the exploitation.Battle · 31 May — 1 June 1916Battle of JutlandHipper draws Beatty towards Scheer, then Beatty leads the pursuit back onto Jellicoe; two unfavourable deployments force Scheer to disengage through battle turns, smoke and torpedoes, before a night escape saves his fleet without loosening the blockade.

Military history

Sources

Specialist heritage institutionMémorial de Verdun, « La bataille de Verdun »

Sections sur les préparatifs, les objectifs, le déroulement et le bilan ; passages commençant par « Le 21 février 1916 à 7 h 15 », puis chronologie des 25 février, 6 mars, 7 juin, 23 juin, 11–12 juillet, 24 octobre, 2–3 novembre et 15–18 décembre ; encadré de bilan donnant 163 000 morts et 216 000 blessés français, 143 000 morts et 190 000 blessés allemands.

General chronology, opening forces, commands, Voie Sacrée, fighting on both banks, forts, counteroffensives and annual casualty categories.

View ↗
Teaching dossier by two historical institutionsMémorial de Verdun et Historial de la Grande Guerre, « L’expérience combattante à Verdun et sur la Somme »

PDF pp. 6–9 pour la chronologie de Verdun ; pp. 9–10 pour les relèves, rotations et la Voie sacrée ; pp. 13–15 pour le bombardement, le terrain, les volumes d’artillerie, la part des pertes dues au feu et le champ de bataille d’environ 20 × 10 km.

Mechanisms of bombardment, terrain constraints, French organisation, logistics, spatial scope and checking orders of magnitude.

View ↗
Specialist article by a historianPaul Jankowski, « Verdun: The Longest Battle of the Great War »

The Historian, Summer 2016, pp. 22–26 : pp. 23–24 sur les origines incertaines, l’absence d’original du mémorandum et les huit divisions du premier coup ; pp. 24–25 sur Douaumont, Pétain, la Voie sacrée et les pertes de la première semaine ; pp. 25–26 sur les deux rives, les contre-offensives, environ 160 000 morts français et 140 000 allemands, et la reprise tardive de Mort-Homme/Côte 304 en 1917.

Historiography of the objectives, tempo of the opening blow, Pétain's system, territorial outcome and caution over strategic significance.

View ↗
Primary source published after the war, authenticity disputedErich von Falkenhayn, « Christmas Memorandum, 1915 »

GHDI, traduction anglaise, pp. 1–2 : paragraphes sur l’impossibilité d’une décision rapide en Russie, les objectifs occidentaux que la France défendrait « jusqu’au dernier homme », le choix entre Belfort et Verdun et la préférence donnée à Verdun ; note éditoriale renvoyant aux mémoires publiés à Berlin en 1920.

Later formulation of the attritional logic and provenance limit; the document is not treated as a recovered contemporary order.

View ↗
Academic historiographical studyGerd Krumeich, étude sur les objectifs allemands à Verdun

PDF pp. 2–3 : note de Schmidt von Knobelsdorf du 4 janvier 1916 visant la prise rapide de la forteresse et des hauteurs de la rive droite, ainsi que la menace française sur les communications allemandes ; p. 4 : pression de Falkenhayn pour accélérer et intensifier l’opération, et critique d’une lecture réduite à la seule « pompe à sang ».

Contemporary operational objective, Knobelsdorf's role and confrontation between territorial conquest and attritional interpretation.

View ↗
Official German historical museumDeutsches Historisches Museum, « Verdun 1916 »

LeMO, paragraphes sur l’offensive du 21 février, la valeur surtout symbolique et localement militaire de Douaumont, la nomination de Pétain, les combats de Mort-Homme/Côte 304 et Vaux, puis l’échec de la percée vers Souville et les contre-offensives françaises.

German institutional perspective, command, geography of the two banks, significance of the forts and absence of a breakthrough.

View ↗
International academic encyclopaedia1914-1918-online, « Warfare 1914–1918 », section Verdun

Version 1.0, section « Verdun » : deux grandes périodes offensive puis contre-offensive ; rôle de Douaumont, Mort-Homme, Côte 304, Vaux, Thiaumont et Fleury ; stabilisation par les renforts et la logistique, extension du 6 mars et absence de percée ouverte.

Operational sequence, logistical stabilisation, articulation of the two banks and distinction between tactical gains and breakthrough.

View ↗
Transcribed institutional history courseMémorial de Verdun, transcription du MOOC « Verdun d’hier à aujourd’hui »

PDF pp. 4–5 : offensive du 24 octobre préparée par Pétain, Nivelle et Mangin, six divisions, environ 600 pièces lourdes, répétitions et barrage roulant ; pp. 29–30 : ligne atteinte à la fin de 1916, rive droite sécurisée et hauteurs de la rive gauche non encore reprises.

Preparation and command of the counteroffensives, October resources and territorial scope of the December result.

View ↗
Direct institutional mapUnited States Military Academy, Map 12 — Verdun and Vicinity, 1916

« Battle of Verdun, Situation 21 February 1916 » : Meuse, Verdun, Mort-Homme, Côte 304, Bois des Caures, Douaumont, Vaux, routes, fortifications et positions initiales de la rive droite.

Map orientation, relative position of the two banks, heights, forts and initial front; no unit micro-position is inferred from it.

View ↗

Edited by BattlesInMotion.com